BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Do you support reunification of divided Balochistan?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 05.01.2009

 Three Baloch groups formally end ceasefire

  QUETTA: Three armed groups in Balochistan on Sunday announced the formal end of a four-month-old unilateral ceasefire in response to the security forces...


 05.01.2009

 Three injured in Dera train attack

* Balochistan Constabulary man killed By Malik Siraj Akbar QUETTA: Unidentified assailants targeted a train going from Balochistan to Sindh on Sunday as armed m...


 05.01.2009

 Gunmen shoot dead two in Quetta

Monday, 05 Jan, 2009 QUETTA: Gunmen riding motorcycles shot dead two men Monday in Quetta, police said. The attackers stopped a rickshaw driver and his frien...


 04.01.2009

 Three killed in attacks on FC in Balochistan

QUETTA: Two officials of the Frontier Corps (FC) were killed and four were injured when an FC patrol struck a landmine in Uch area of Dera Bugti, early on Satur...


 03.01.2009

 Balochistan: 4 killed in Sui operation

SUI: Four more people have been killed during security forces operation against militants in Uch area of Sui on Friday. The operation was launched on Thursday i...


all news >>

FACTS    

An editorial Development & violence

10.01.2005

BALOCHISTAN, which was neglected for so long, is currently at the top of the development agenda with six mega projects worth Rs 120 billion under execution there. The paradigm shift in Islamabad?Ts attitude to Balochistan has however led to a situation not expected by Islamabad.

Violence against the symbols of state power has reached levels never seen before. A report issued by the provinces?T IGP tells of 771 rockets fired during 2002-2004, killing 15 and injuring 50. The number of bomb blasts and attacks on security personnel during the last three years has been unprecedented in the province?Ts history.

Last month, 11 persons, mostly civilians, were killed and 21 injured when a bomb was detonated near a military vehicle in Quetta. Numerous incidents of violence have taken place during the last week. These include a powerful explosion which jolted a paramilitary base in Turbat, another blast in front of the FC officers mess in Kalat and yet another in Quetta. A lady doctor working in the Sui Field Hospital was severely roughed up by unknown persons who broke into her room inside the hospital. 

The routine reaction by the administration to such cases is to arrest ?osuspects?, mostly workers of nationalist parties, despite their leaders invariably condemning acts of terrorism; announce compensations for the victims and vow to deal with the miscreants with an iron hand. This has gone on for the last three years without in the least improving the situation. On the other hand arbitrary arrests continue to add to resentment. 

There are many who think the highly centralised and bureaucratic approach to development is a major reason behind the resentment. Development projects are conceived in far-off Islamabad without consulting local people or considering their real needs, and without associating local stakeholders in the process.

This creates a perception among the people that while those from outside the province make big gains; they are not provided the opportunity to share in the fruits of development. Gwadar is cited as an example. It is maintained that the provincial share in the profits accruing from the projects is insignificant and that the development benefits others. In the Saindak project for instance, the Chinese get 74 percent, the federal government 25 percent, and the province only 1 percent.

It is also contended that while the federal government earns Rs 65 billion from the Sui gas fields, the province is given a meager Rs 5 billion. There is a need for both the government and the nationalist parties to avoid the language of threats. The government should release political activists arrested on mere suspicion and those boycotting the parliamentary committee on Balochistan should again join the ongoing deliberations to evolve a peaceful resolution of all outstanding issues, including the mega projects.

« Previous  |  Next »

• 03.01.2005 - Viewpoints on Balochistan development process
• 01.01.2005 - Balochistan
• 30.12.2004 - BALOCHISTAN CONTINUES TO HAUNT MUSHARRAF
• 21.12.2004 - How India’s Intelligence Establishment Sees the Balochistan Situation
• 16.12.2004 - Crackdown against Balochs

All facts

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 30.09 - Requiem for Reko Diq
 13.06 - Will history absolve them?
 13.05 - Testing times
 08.04 - Essentially bogus
 24.03 - Is a rollback possible?

 - Senator Sanaullah Baloch

 02.11 - Balochistan: myth of development
 22.09 - The case against Musharraf
 05.08 - A lesson to be learnt
 16.05 - Balochistan peace prospects
 15.05 - The Baloch-Islamabad conflict

 - Aziz Baloch

 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Womens Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: Its Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis
 07.07 - Balochistan: Invisible to the International Community?

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright 2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP