BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Will Baloch unity succeed in getting Baloch United?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 10.03.2010

 FC vehicle damaged in bomb attack

March 10, 2010 QUETTA-A vehicle of Frontier Corps (FC) was damaged in a remote controlled bomb attack in Khuzdar district of Balochistan, some 360 kilometers ...


 10.03.2010

 Qambar Chakar Baloch case!!!

Asad Baloch March 10 At times Baloch students, lecturers and teachers are being charged according to the act of terrorism, later they are tortured. Som...


 08.03.2010

 Baloch Protesters demand immediate release of Abdul Malik Regi

Karachi: Baloch political activist protested against the arrest of the leader of ‘Jandullah’ now BPRM Mr Abdul Malik Regi and demanded his immediate release, Ma...


 08.03.2010

 Three injured in Dera Bugti blast

QUETTA: Three men belonging to the Bugti tribe were injured in a bomb blast at Achanak Chowk in Dera Bugti, on Sunday evening. According to police, a convoy of ...


 07.03.2010

 Protestors demand recovery of Baloch missing persons

Sunday, 07 Mar, 2010   QUETTA: Family members of missing persons staged a protest demonstration outside the Quetta Press Club on Sunday. The prote...


all news >>

OPINIONS    

KARACHI: Baloch leaders unimpressed by PPP apology

27.02.2008

By Latif Baloch

 

KARACHI, Feb 26: The recent apology tendered by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) to the people of Balochistan appears not to have had its desired effect since the founder of the Balochistan National Party (BNP), Sardar Ataullah Mengal, on Tuesday termed the apology a positive but insufficient step, and expressed a lack of hope in the PPP being able to solve the problems of the country’s largest but least populous province.

“The civil-military bureaucracy has always called the shots here,” he commented.

Sardar Mengal was amongst a number of nationalist Baloch leaders who responded to a resolution passed on Sunday by a meeting of the PPP provincial parliamentary party in Islamabad. In what is also read as an effort to reach out towards the only province where the party is not assured of a share in provincial power, the resolution stated that “The PPP, on behalf of the people of Pakistan, apologises to the people of the province of Balochistan for the atrocities and injustices committed against them and pledges to embark on a new highway of healing and mutual respect.”

However Sardar Mengal and other nationalist Baloch leaders said the situation in the troubled province would remain unchanged until the “colonial perception of the rulers” changed and basic issues such as provincial autonomy were addressed.

Sardar Mengal, who headed the province’s first democratically-elected government in the 1970s, said that the policy statement issued by the PPP was a step in the right direction but was “not enough since the wounds inflicted on the Baloch people were very deep.”

Expressing little faith in the PPP’s ability to solve Balochistan’s issues, he argued that in fact, this was not within the power of any political leadership since the civil-military bureaucracy had always called the shots in the province. He observed that the PPP risked a confrontation with these forces, which continued to prop President Musharraf in his office despite the fact that the people had already given their verdict against him.

“The real rulers have never been serious about finding a lasting solution to the Balochistan issue because of their sinister designs,” stated Sardar Mengal. “Had they been serious about dialogue, we would not have reached the stage we are at today.”

Blaming the rulers for their lust for power and wealth, the BNP leader said that “we are headed towards a very serious crisis and no solution is currently in sight,” maintaining that there was a conflict of interest between Islamabad’s rulers and the Baloch people since the former wanted to exploit resources that rightfully belonged to the latter.

‘PPP’s poor track record’

Taking a similar tone, the secretary-general of the National Party (NP), Mir Hasil Bizenjo, described PPP’s gesture as “welcome” but expressed reservations over the fact that the apology did not specify a time period.

“The pledges made by the PPP government were not implemented when the party came to power earlier,” he pointed out. “Its past record is not too impressive in this regard.” He gave the example of the time when, during the MRD, the PPP signed an agreement with the component parties of the alliance granting maximum autonomy to the provinces. When it came to power in 1988, however, this agreement was bypassed.

“The country would not have reached this volatile stage had the establishment recognised the people’s sovereign rule over the country and their right to control their own resources,” said Mir Bizenjo. “Now, the PPP leadership must initially halt the military operation and set up a commission to inquire into the gruesome murders of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti and Balaach Marri.”

Yusuf Khan Mustikhan, a central leader of the National Workers’ Party (NWP), echoed these sentiments, saying that a mere apology could not solve the Balochistan problem but, in fact, the core issue of autonomy had to be resolved in line with the expectation of the Baloch people.

“During the MRD, the PPP agreed on the quantum of autonomy by allowing the centre control over defence, foreign affairs and residual subjects, including taxation,” he reiterated. “It did not implement the agreement when it came to power.”

Mr Mustikhan pointed out that the Balochistan issue was basically political in nature and could have been settled had the government adopted peaceful means instead of brute force. Holding the government responsible for the armed conflict in the province, the NWP leader said that “the government could end the deadlock by pulling troops out and granting full autonomy to the province.”

http://www.dawn.com/2008/02/27/local2.htm

« Previous  |  Next »

• 26.02.2008 - Editorials and comments on Zardari’s apologies to Balochistan
• 18.02.2008 - Balochistan: Lukewarm, to say the least
• 14.02.2008 - Pakistan to serve as trade, energy corridor through Gwadar:
• 14.02.2008 - The disillusioned voters of Gwadar
• 13.02.2008 - Pakistan at crossroads

All opinions

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 07.03 - ANALYSIS: Malthus’s disciples
 07.03 - analysis: Midas’s gold
 14.02 - ANALYSIS: Musings on Pakistan
 07.02 - ANALYSIS: Buy land — they’re not making it anymore
 31.01 - ANALYSIS: ANTI-BALOCH CLIQUE?" PART II‏

 -  Sanaullah Baloch

 03.03 - COMMENT: The Balochistan truth
 01.02 - Islamabad’s ‘gunboat’ policy
 21.12 - The Balochistan ‘package’
 23.11 - The Baloch ‘Intifada’
 21.09 - The Balochistan ‘package’

 - Aziz Baloch

 14.04 - A Message to Honorable Leaders of the Baloch "Nation"
 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Women’s Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: It’s Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright ©2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP